Empirical investigation of the conflict and flexibility models of bisexuality

D. Moore, F. Norris

The present study was designed to investigate theoretical assumptions underlying Zinik's conflict and flexibility models of bisexuality (1985). Of particular interest were potential differences among heterosexual, gay/lesbian, and bisexual individuals on measures of flexibility and sexuality conflict. Participants were recruited from an urban jury pool and from gay, lesbian, and bisexual groups. The final sample included three gender-balanced sexual orientation groups of 46 individuals each. Results failed to support the prediction that bisexual individuals would score higher on flexibility measures than heterosexuals or gay/lesbian individuals. Bisexuals were found to be more conflicted about their sexuality than heterosexuals or gay/lesbian individuals. Other findings both supported and conflicted with the theoretical models, suggesting the need for further research.[Copies are available from: Haworth Document Delivery Center. The Haworth Press, Inc., 10 Alice Street, Binghamton, NY 13904-1580, USA]

specificaties

  • Tijdschrift
  • Engels

praktische informatie

Boekcode
IHLIA Homodok ts. niet uitleenbaar
Taal publicatie
eng [Engels]
Hoofdtitel
Empirical investigation of the conflict and flexibility models of bisexuality
Algemene materiaalaanduiding
18 [Tijdschriftartikel]
Eerste verantwoordelijke
Debra L. Moore, Fran H. Norris
Annotatie
In: Journal of Bisexuality; vol./jrg.:
Bibliografische annotatie - Publicatiedata
5 (2005), nr. 1, pp. 5-25
Auteur Achternaam
Moore
Auteur Voornaam
D.
Auteur - secundaire - Achternaam
Norris
Auteur - secundaire - Voornaam
F.
Prod country
usa
Samenvatting - Tekst
The present study was designed to investigate theoretical assumptions underlying Zinik's conflict and flexibility models of bisexuality (1985). Of particular interest were potential differences among heterosexual, gay/lesbian, and bisexual individuals on measures of flexibility and sexuality conflict. Participants were recruited from an urban jury pool and from gay, lesbian, and bisexual groups. The final sample included three gender-balanced sexual orientation groups of 46 individuals each. Results failed to support the prediction that bisexual individuals would score higher on flexibility measures than heterosexuals or gay/lesbian individuals. Bisexuals were found to be more conflicted about their sexuality than heterosexuals or gay/lesbian individuals. Other findings both supported and conflicted with the theoretical models, suggesting the need for further research., [Copies are available from: Haworth Document Delivery Center. The Haworth Press, Inc., 10 Alice Street, Binghamton, NY 13904-1580, USA]

Blijf op de hoogte van het laatste nieuws

Nooit meer iets missen? Meld je aan voor een nieuwsbrief van de OBA en ontvang ons laatste nieuws, boekentips, activiteiten en nog veel meer in je mailbox.

Schrijf je in
Open in a new window