Naar hoofdinhoud

Notes of Proceedings in Suresh Kumar Kaushal v. Naz Foundation February 23 to March 27, 2012 Supreme Court of India

In December 2001 the Naz Foundation files a petition challenging Section 377 in Delhi High Court. The judgment of the Delhi High Court in Naz Foundation vs. Union of India was delivered on 2nd July, 2009. From there on Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed followed before the Supreme Court against the Delhi High Court's order de-criminalizing homosexuality. There have been a wide range of concerns raised by the PILs on the consequences of the Delhi High Court's order by anti-homosexual persons and institutions. The first petitioner challenging the order was astrologer S.K. Kaushal, who sought an interim stay of the High Court's order, on the grounds that "gay parlours" and "gay prostitution" were mushrooming in the aftermath of the judgement and there were also instances of same sex marriages taking place. These notes gives the chronology of dates from 2001 and court proceedings of the advocates pleas. See also: The right that dares to speak its name (right/dar) g # pdf.

specificaties

praktische informatie

Boekcode
IHLIA Homodok cat. (notes/pro/sur) # digitale bibliotheek grijs niet uitleenbaar
Taal publicatie
eng [Engels]
Hoofdtitel
Notes of Proceedings in Suresh Kumar Kaushal v. Naz Foundation February 23 to March 27, 2012 Supreme Court of India
Algemene materiaalaanduiding
2 [Boek]
Plaats van uitgave
[S.l.
Uitgever
Jaar van uitgave
2012
Pagina's
125 bl
Prod country
india
Opmerkingen - Tekst
Dit rapport is te downloaden op: http://orinam.net/content/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Naz SC Transcript 2012 final.pdf
Samenvatting - Tekst
In December 2001 the Naz Foundation files a petition challenging Section 377 in Delhi High Court. The judgment of the Delhi High Court in Naz Foundation vs. Union of India was delivered on 2nd July, 2009. From there on Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed followed before the Supreme Court against the Delhi High Court's order de-criminalizing homosexuality. There have been a wide range of concerns raised by the PILs on the consequences of the Delhi High Court's order by anti-homosexual persons and institutions. The first petitioner challenging the order was astrologer S.K. Kaushal, who sought an interim stay of the High Court's order, on the grounds that "gay parlours" and "gay prostitution" were mushrooming in the aftermath of the judgement and there were also instances of same sex marriages taking place. These notes gives the chronology of dates from 2001 and court proceedings of the advocates pleas. See also: The right that dares to speak its name (right/dar) g # pdf.

Blijf op de hoogte van het laatste nieuws

Nooit meer iets missen? Meld je aan voor een nieuwsbrief van de OBA en ontvang ons laatste nieuws, boekentips, activiteiten en nog veel meer in je mailbox.

Schrijf je in (opent in een nieuw tabblad/venster)