California Supreme Court Rules Gay Unions Have No Standing

D. Murphy

SAN FRANCISCO, Aug. 12 - The California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a blitz of same-sex weddings here in February and March had no standing under state law and declared the marriages "void and of no legal effect from their inception."In a unanimous ruling, the justices said that Mayor Gavin Newsom of San Francisco had exceeded his authority in allowing the marriages. By a 5-to-2 vote, the court also rendered the licenses, more than 4,000 in all, nothing more than a collector's item, ordering city officials to remove any record of them from the books and to offer the couples refunds of license fees.The decision was narrow legally, applying only to the issue of executive authority and not to the constitutionality of state law limiting marriage to unions between a man and a woman.

specificaties

  • Tijdschrift
  • Engels

praktische informatie

Boekcode
IHLIA Homodok full_text # knipsel (homohuwelijk btl) niet uitleenbaar
Taal publicatie
eng [Engels]
Hoofdtitel
California Supreme Court Rules Gay Unions Have No Standing
Algemene materiaalaanduiding
18 [Tijdschriftartikel]
Eerste verantwoordelijke
Dean Murphy
Annotatie
In: New York Times; vol./jrg.:
Bibliografische annotatie - Publicatiedata
(13-08-2004)
Auteur Achternaam
Murphy
Auteur Voornaam
D.
Prod country
usa
Samenvatting - Tekst
SAN FRANCISCO, Aug. 12 - The California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a blitz of same-sex weddings here in February and March had no standing under state law and declared the marriages "void and of no legal effect from their inception.", In a unanimous ruling, the justices said that Mayor Gavin Newsom of San Francisco had exceeded his authority in allowing the marriages. By a 5-to-2 vote, the court also rendered the licenses, more than 4,000 in all, nothing more than a collector's item, ordering city officials to remove any record of them from the books and to offer the couples refunds of license fees., The decision was narrow legally, applying only to the issue of executive authority and not to the constitutionality of state law limiting marriage to unions between a man and a woman.

Blijf op de hoogte van het laatste nieuws

Nooit meer iets missen? Meld je aan voor een nieuwsbrief van de OBA en ontvang ons laatste nieuws, boekentips, activiteiten en nog veel meer in je mailbox.

Schrijf je in
Open in a new window