Partner type and sexual risk behavior among HIV positive gay and bisexual men : social cognitive correlates

S. Semple, T. Patterson, I. Grant

Researchers examine the relationship between partner type and sexual risk behavior in a sample of HIV positive gay and bisexual men by using elements of the social cognitive theory. The results show that men with steady partners and men with anonymous partners had the most unprotected anal intercourse (UAI), while men with casual partners had the least. Men with anonymous partners had the lowest scores on self-efficacy and outcome expectancies for condom use, negotiation, and disclosure. Outcome expectancies for negotiation of safer sex were inversely related to UAI for men with steady partners. Self-efficacy for condom use and negotiation were inversely related to UAI for men with casual partners. The authors suggest the need to develop programs that can address sexual risk behavior in a broad context and also take into account unique patterns of behavior that are associated with different partner types, relationship issues, normative expectations, and standards for behavior.

specificaties
  • Tijdschrift
  • Engels

praktische informatie

Boekcode
IHLIA Homodok ts. niet uitleenbaar
Taal publicatie
eng [Engels]
Hoofdtitel
Partner type and sexual risk behavior among HIV positive gay and bisexual men : social cognitive correlates
Algemene materiaalaanduiding
18 [Tijdschriftartikel]
Eerste verantwoordelijke
Shirley J. Semple, Thomas L. Patterson, Igor Grant
Annotatie
In: AIDS Education and Prevention; vol./jrg.:
Bibliografische annotatie - Publicatiedata
12 (2000), nr. 4 (Aug), pp. 340-356
Auteur Achternaam
Semple
Auteur Voornaam
S.
Auteur - secundaire - Achternaam
Patterson, Grant
Auteur - secundaire - Voornaam
T., I.
Prod country
usa
Samenvatting - Tekst
Researchers examine the relationship between partner type and sexual risk behavior in a sample of HIV positive gay and bisexual men by using elements of the social cognitive theory. The results show that men with steady partners and men with anonymous partners had the most unprotected anal intercourse (UAI), while men with casual partners had the least. Men with anonymous partners had the lowest scores on self-efficacy and outcome expectancies for condom use, negotiation, and disclosure. Outcome expectancies for negotiation of safer sex were inversely related to UAI for men with steady partners. Self-efficacy for condom use and negotiation were inversely related to UAI for men with casual partners. The authors suggest the need to develop programs that can address sexual risk behavior in a broad context and also take into account unique patterns of behavior that are associated with different partner types, relationship issues, normative expectations, and standards for behavior.

Blijf op de hoogte van het laatste nieuws

Nooit meer iets missen? Meld je aan voor een nieuwsbrief van de OBA en ontvang ons laatste nieuws, boekentips, activiteiten en nog veel meer in je mailbox.

Schrijf je in
Open in a new window